The cost of laser would be slightly higher typically estimated at around 20 hour.
Laser cutting vs waterjet cost.
Customers often choose laser cutting for its cost effectiveness cutting tolerances as close as 003 repeatability 001 and for its cutting capacity up to 3 4 carbon steel and 5 8 stainless steel.
Thick and brass less than 0 16 in.
With the automatic dual pallet loading system and lights out capability we can ensure quick.
Waterjet will depend on the quality of the outcome.
Choosing between laser and waterjet cutting would therefore entirely depend on your specifications.
Waterjet is both slow and costly to run making it the least productive system to operate.
The benefit of the laser cutter is its ability to cut thinner material at a far higher rate of speed than the water jet.
Let s do some quick math.
The accuracy and quality of the cut.
The bottom line the best method to use whether its plasma cutting vs.
The cutting stream of a water jet is typically 030 040 in.
Laser cutters can cut thick materials but a waterjet machine can cut thicker objects the optimal thickness being 0 4 to 2 0 10 to 50 mm while for laser cutting it is 0 12 to 0 4 3 to 10 mm.
It s not possible to say which one is better as each can be more suitable for different materials and applications.
Type of metal or material you d like to cut cost involved the efficiency of the machine or.
Waterjet cutting vs laser cutting.
Say you have a project that adds up to 15 000 in total cuts.
Choosing between laser and waterjet cutting is not as straightforward as it may seem.
Many advertisements for fiber laser tout its ability to cut brass copper and aluminum.
When cutting thin materials with laser very high cutting speeds can be achieved which can help to reduce the cost per part.
Combined with the speed and precision of cutting waterjet vs.
Generally though laser will cut faster on aluminum less than 0 20 in.
Method and the convenience of each method.
Laser cutting cost in terms of operation is not even close.
Waterjet cutting is much slower and much more costly per hour of use.
In thickness of 1 4 and less the laser would be the more cost effective option when cutting metals.