Are done without laser.
Laser spine surgery vs traditional.
Minimally invasive spine surgery.
Additionally more complex or complicated conditions will often require a more traditional surgical.
Then the surgeon.
Doctors who support laser spinal surgery maintain it is more efficient effective and gentle than traditional methods.
Hardware is needed to keep things in place.
Minimally invasive spine surgery is a newer and innovative technique to spinal care.
The truth is minimally invasive spine surgery miss can be performed as effectively and probably more effectively without a laser.
No muscle or bone damage.
Alternatively regenerative stem cell and platelet treatments actually seek to improve disc and nerve health.
In fact i now have to give the above air quote when i talk about laser spine surgery with my patients.
Traditional open spine surgery.
Each approach has specific pros and cons and therefore weighing minimally invasive spine surgery vs traditional surgery can make a difference in your surgical outcome for back or neck pain.
Laser back surgery isn t recommended for some conditions such as degenerative spine diseases.
A laser is used to make the necessary cuts rather than the scalpel used in more traditional surgery.
Main differences between laser and traditional.
Both types of surgeries have the end goal of relieving your pain by stabilizing your spine by taking pressure off your affected nerves.
In other words laser surgery will theoretically cause decreased blood loss and scarring.
In fact more than 95 of minimally invasive spine procedures in the u s.
Laser spine surgery vs.
An incision is needed to insert the laser into the appropriate area.
Written by deuk spine institute.
Patients often assume that laser means more technically advanced.
Muscle tissues are pulled aside so surgeons can get a good look at the problem and repair it.
Traditional spine surgery involves scalpels or other precision cutting tools and often entails opening up the back with a wide or long incision.
In rare cases laser spine surgery may not be recommended but when it is it s something to seriously consider as an alternative to traditional open spine surgery.
The laser is then used to remove any soft tissues that need to be removed.
Laser in my opinion isn t a viable alternative to traditional low back surgery.
Laser spine surgery is heavily marketed on the internet and tv as better and safer than traditional surgical techniques and claims to give a quicker recovery these claims are unproven and can be mis leading.
Doctors who perform laser spine surgery claim that it is more efficient and effective than minimally invasive spine surgery using more traditional surgical methods.
In the traditional open approach the surgeon s incision goes through the skin to the muscle.